There's a question that could unlock millions in revenue. Most companies are too afraid to ask it.
I know because I've sat in hundreds of conference rooms where executives avoid it. I've watched boards dance around it. I've seen GTM teams rationalize their way out of asking it for quarters on end.
The question is simple: "Why did you choose our competitor?"
Not "what could we have done better?" Not "was there anything we could improve?" Not the sanitized version that lets everyone save face. The real question. Asked to the real people who said no. With genuine curiosity about what they'll say back.
Most companies will do anything to avoid asking it. They'll hire consultants to study the market. They'll run surveys with carefully worded questions that can't produce uncomfortable answers. They'll have their sales team "capture loss reasons" in the CRM, knowing those reasons are filtered through the ego of someone who just lost a deal.
But they won't pick up the phone and ask the buyer directly: "You had a choice. You picked them. Why?"
Why We Don't Ask
Let's be honest about what's really happening when companies avoid this question. It's not logistics. It's not that buyers won't talk – they will, surprisingly often, if you ask the right way. It's fear.
- Fear that the answer will be "your product isn't good enough”. Because then you have to go back to the board and say the 18-month roadmap everyone's excited about might be solving the wrong problems.
- Fear that the answer will be "your team didn't build trust”. Because then you have to have difficult conversations about sales effectiveness, and nobody wants to tell their star closer that buyers don't believe them.
- Fear that the answer will be "honestly, we barely considered you”. Because then you have to admit that all those deals in your pipeline weren't really deals at all, and your forecasting model is fiction.
So instead of asking, companies create elaborate systems to avoid asking. They log "loss reasons" in Salesforce. They review competitive intelligence reports. They read analyst papers about market trends. They workshop their positioning in offsite meetings. All of it designed to answer the question without actually having to hear what buyers would say if you asked them directly.
I get it. I've been the person in that room. When I was running product marketing at a previous role, we had a quarter where we lost three deals in a row that we were "certain" we'd win. Big deals. The kind that blow a hole in your forecast.
We did a post-mortem. The team had explanations, one was a pricing issue, one was a timing issue, one was because the champion left the company mid-cycle.
All of it sounded reasonable. All of it let us avoid the uncomfortable conclusion that maybe, just maybe, we didn't understand why people were choosing competitors as well as we thought we did.
It took a board member finally saying, "Has anyone actually talked to these buyers?" for us to realize we were having an elaborate internal conversation about assumptions instead of a simple external conversation about facts.
The Company That Finally Asked
A healthcare company I’ll call HealthTech Co came to us with a straightforward problem, growth was slowing. Not collapsing – they were still growing 20-25% annually, but down from 40%+. The board wanted to know why and what to do about it.
Management’s theory: compete more aggressively against the two category leaders, build features to match them, price competitively and hire their salespeople.
Solid plan and well-reasoned. There was just one problem – they hadn't actually asked buyers why they were choosing competitors.
So we interviewed 25 recent losses. People who’d evaluated HealthTech Co and chosen to go with someone else. We asked them to walk us through their decision process. What they cared about. What concerns they had. How they thought about the options.
And here's what we learned:
They weren't competing in the fight they thought they were in.
In 60% of the deals they lost, they weren't being compared to the big category leaders. They were being compared to a smaller, nimbler point solution that did one thing really well, plus a general-purpose tool the buyer already owned.
Buyers weren't thinking, "Should I go with Market Leader A or HealthTech Co?". They were thinking, "Do I buy HealthTech Co's comprehensive platform, or do I just use Solution X for the specific problem I'm trying to solve right now and make do with Tool Y for everything else?"
Different question. Different competitive set entirely.
And here's the kicker, when we dug deeper into why buyers were making that choice, the answer wasn't features or price. It was risk.
Buyers liked HealthTech Co's platform. They could see the value of having everything integrated. But adopting it meant replacing multiple tools, getting budget for a larger purchase, and convincing their team to change workflows.
The "good enough plus free" option meant less disruption. Less budget approval required. Less risk if it didn't work out.
HealthTech Co was losing on perceived implementation risk and organizational change management, not on product capability.
But here's where it gets interesting. As we kept talking to buyers, a different pattern emerged. Several of them said some version of: "We really liked what you're doing, but we couldn't rip out [Category Leader] completely. We wished we could use you alongside them."
That sentence, repeated by different buyers in different conversations, changed everything.
The company had assumed they needed to compete with the category leaders. Replace them. Win the whole deal or lose completely.
But buyers were actually saying, "We'd use you both if we could."
Six months later, HealthTech Co had a signed partnership with one of the large, established platforms they'd been trying to compete against. A real go-to-market partnership where they sold into each other's customer bases.
The logic was simple once they understood what buyers actually wanted. The platform provider got to offer a specialized capability they didn't want to build themselves. HealthTech Co got distribution into thousands of accounts they could never reach on their own.
Within a year, that partnership channel represented about a third of their total pipeline.
Not 33% of new pipeline. 33% of total pipeline. Deals they wouldn't have even known existed if they'd stuck with their "compete head-to-head" strategy.
The product didn't change. The pricing didn't change. The team didn't change. All that changed was their understanding of how buyers actually thought about the problem, and their willingness to build a GTM strategy around that reality instead of assumptions.
And it all started with asking the question they’d been avoiding: “Why did you choose our competitor?”
What Asking Actually Looks Like
Let me be specific about how to do this, because most companies don’t execute this right even when they try.
- Ask soon after the decision. Within two weeks of possible. Buyers forget fast. Reasons articulated three months later are rationalized and sanitized. The reasons they share two weeks later are real.
- Have someone neutral ask. Not the rep who lost the deal. Not the founder. Someone the buyer has no reason to be polite to. We usually have someone from our team do it. Or someone from the client's ops or strategy team. Never sales.
- Don’t defend or explain. The fastest way to shut down honesty is responding with "actually, we do have that" or "if the rep had explained better..." You're there to listen.
- Ask open-ended questions and follow the thread. Don’t have a script, ensure you’re having a conversation. And remember, the gold isn’t in the first answer. It’s in the second or third follow-up when they get specific.
- Look for patterns, not individual feedback. One buyer saying something is interesting. Five saying it independently is signal. Ten is a systemic problem you need to fix.
The ROI of Uncomfortable Conversations
The truth is rarely as bad as you fear. But it's almost always different than you expect.
Sometimes you learn your product really does have gaps that matter. Now you can prioritize the roadmap based on what actually influences deals instead of what's loudest internally.
Sometimes you learn your sales team is having the wrong conversation. Fine. Now you can retrain them on the conversation buyers actually want to have.
Sometimes you learn you're not even in the consideration set for a segment you thought was a core target. Painful, but now you can stop wasting resources on a segment that isn't buying.
And sometimes, like HealthTech Co, you learn that the entire strategic frame you've been operating under is wrong, and there's a completely different path to growth sitting in plain sight.
The companies that consistently win aren't the ones with the best product or the biggest budget. They're the ones that understand their buyers better than anyone else because they systematically ask questions everyone else is afraid to ask.
So, are you going to ask?
Want help asking the question?
We've done this hundreds of times. We know how to get honest answers and turn findings into strategy that moves the business.
